<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Media by Choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediabychoice.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediabychoice.com</link>
	<description>The research blog for critics of captive-audience media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:41:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Noise Wars review looks at privacy, audience captivity by R. Freedman</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1522&#038;cpage=1#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Freedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1522#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>Good points. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Noise Wars review looks at privacy, audience captivity by Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1522&#038;cpage=1#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 03:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1522#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>Many would dispute the notion that there is actually a right to privacy contained in the U.S. Constitution.  (I suspect some of  whom are sitting as Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court).

When it comes to privacy we have fewer rights than you would imagine. One of the best books out there on the subject is &quot;The Right to Privacy&quot; by Caroline Kennedy and Ellen Alderman. It&#039;s a series of true-life case studies where public policy clashes with personal privacy. 

It recounts routine strip searches of women accused of such minor offenses as traffic tickets, right-to-die decisions, ownership of frozen embryos, drug interdiction, televised death, a school administrator&#039;s search of a student&#039;s pocketbook. 

It was written over 10 years ago, but it seems to become more relevant with each passing year. 

On another topic, the idea of treating corporations as individuals dates back to the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Conceived as a means of giving equal rights to former slaves, industry interests quickly won judicial decisions establishing that the constitutional provision extended to corporations soon after it took effect.

An interesting documentary called &quot;The Corporation&quot; covers this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many would dispute the notion that there is actually a right to privacy contained in the U.S. Constitution.  (I suspect some of  whom are sitting as Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court).</p>
<p>When it comes to privacy we have fewer rights than you would imagine. One of the best books out there on the subject is &#8220;The Right to Privacy&#8221; by Caroline Kennedy and Ellen Alderman. It&#8217;s a series of true-life case studies where public policy clashes with personal privacy. </p>
<p>It recounts routine strip searches of women accused of such minor offenses as traffic tickets, right-to-die decisions, ownership of frozen embryos, drug interdiction, televised death, a school administrator&#8217;s search of a student&#8217;s pocketbook. </p>
<p>It was written over 10 years ago, but it seems to become more relevant with each passing year. </p>
<p>On another topic, the idea of treating corporations as individuals dates back to the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Conceived as a means of giving equal rights to former slaves, industry interests quickly won judicial decisions establishing that the constitutional provision extended to corporations soon after it took effect.</p>
<p>An interesting documentary called &#8220;The Corporation&#8221; covers this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Up to 57 percent call taxi TV annoying by rfreedman</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1573&#038;cpage=1#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator>rfreedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1573#comment-1450</guid>
		<description>Toronto, thanks for commenting. I appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toronto, thanks for commenting. I appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Up to 57 percent call taxi TV annoying by Toronto Taxi</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1573&#038;cpage=1#comment-1449</link>
		<dc:creator>Toronto Taxi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1573#comment-1449</guid>
		<description>i don,t agreed with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don,t agreed with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 12,105 acts of protest against captive-audience media by Tweets that mention 12,105 acts of protest against captive-audience media « Media by Choice -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1560&#038;cpage=1#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention 12,105 acts of protest against captive-audience media « Media by Choice -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1560#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by RFreedman, TheoAndTheGuys. TheoAndTheGuys said: What would they think of Yonge-Dundas Square in Toronto? - http://tinyurl.com/ya8jfv3 Be afraid! #toronto [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by RFreedman, TheoAndTheGuys. TheoAndTheGuys said: What would they think of Yonge-Dundas Square in Toronto? &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ya8jfv3" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ya8jfv3</a> Be afraid! #toronto [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Noise Wars review looks at privacy, audience captivity by R. Freedman</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1522&#038;cpage=1#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Freedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1522#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Steve. Points well taken. I agree a lot of people wonder if the Supreme Court stretched when it connected a right to privacy with liberty. Privacy is definitely not something we can take for granted, unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Steve. Points well taken. I agree a lot of people wonder if the Supreme Court stretched when it connected a right to privacy with liberty. Privacy is definitely not something we can take for granted, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Noise Wars review looks at privacy, audience captivity by Steven Roll</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1522&#038;cpage=1#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Roll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1522#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>Many would dispute the notion that there is actually a right to privacy contained in the U.S. Constitution.  (I suspect some of  whom are sitting as Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court).

When it comes to privacy we have fewer rights than you would imagine. One of the best books out there on the subject is &quot;The Right to Privacy&quot; by Caroline Kennedy and Ellen Alderman. It&#039;s a series of true-life case studies where public policy clashes with personal privacy. 

It recounts routine strip searches of women accused of such minor offenses as traffic tickets, right-to-die decisions, ownership of frozen embryos, drug interdiction, televised death, a school administrator&#039;s search of a student&#039;s pocketbook. 

It was written over 10 years ago, but it seems to become more relevant with each passing year. 

On another topic, the idea of treating corporations as individuals dates back to the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Conceived as a means of giving equal rights to former slaves, industry interests quickly won judicial decisions establishing that the constitutional provision extended to corporations soon after it took effect.

An interesting documentary called &quot;The Corporation&quot; covers this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many would dispute the notion that there is actually a right to privacy contained in the U.S. Constitution.  (I suspect some of  whom are sitting as Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court).</p>
<p>When it comes to privacy we have fewer rights than you would imagine. One of the best books out there on the subject is &#8220;The Right to Privacy&#8221; by Caroline Kennedy and Ellen Alderman. It&#8217;s a series of true-life case studies where public policy clashes with personal privacy. </p>
<p>It recounts routine strip searches of women accused of such minor offenses as traffic tickets, right-to-die decisions, ownership of frozen embryos, drug interdiction, televised death, a school administrator&#8217;s search of a student&#8217;s pocketbook. </p>
<p>It was written over 10 years ago, but it seems to become more relevant with each passing year. </p>
<p>On another topic, the idea of treating corporations as individuals dates back to the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Conceived as a means of giving equal rights to former slaves, industry interests quickly won judicial decisions establishing that the constitutional provision extended to corporations soon after it took effect.</p>
<p>An interesting documentary called &#8220;The Corporation&#8221; covers this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Parents ratchet up anti-Channel One effort by Parent</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1277&#038;cpage=1#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>Parent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1277#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>Take a look at what&#039;s being shown to kids on Channel One News: http://96.0.145.51/channelonenews/1.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at what&#8217;s being shown to kids on Channel One News: <a href="http://96.0.145.51/channelonenews/1.html" rel="nofollow">http://96.0.145.51/channelonenews/1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DOOH and involuntary attention: cynical manipulation by uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1381&#038;cpage=1#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1381#comment-864</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by MediabyChoice: DOOH and involuntary attention: cynical manipulation http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1381...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by MediabyChoice: DOOH and involuntary attention: cynical manipulation <a href="http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1381.." rel="nofollow">http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1381..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DOOH and involuntary attention: cynical manipulation by R. Freedman</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1381&#038;cpage=1#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Freedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabychoice.com/?p=1381#comment-842</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Terry, &quot;involuntary attention&quot; is the link between &quot;push&quot; and &quot;pull&quot; media, so it&#039;s a really important concept from a captive-audience media perspective. The EEG readings on your site are eye-opening. Keep up the good work.
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Terry, &#8220;involuntary attention&#8221; is the link between &#8220;push&#8221; and &#8220;pull&#8221; media, so it&#8217;s a really important concept from a captive-audience media perspective. The EEG readings on your site are eye-opening. Keep up the good work.<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
